Re: FW: for the Webnet anonymator: does this pass for an"accessibility" page?

From: Kathleen Satz <ksatz_at_berkeley.edu>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:58:20 -0800

Dear anonymous:

You may want to check in with the WebAccess group on campus -- this is their
specialty. The group email is webaccess_at_lists.berkeley.edu.

There are also some top tips developed by WebAccess, and other accessibility
resources, on Webnet's site under "Developer Resources."
http://webnet.berkeley.edu/resources.php

Kathleen

-----Original Message-----
From: webnet-list-bounces_at_lists.berkeley.edu
[mailto:webnet-list-bounces_at_lists.berkeley.edu] On Behalf Of Debra
Goldentyer
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 1:50 PM
To: webnet-list_at_berkeley.edu
Subject: [Webnet] FW: for the Webnet anonymator: does this pass for
an"accessibility" page?

Dear anonymator,

I have a uh... friend.... at um... a University..... whose new site
features a link called "Disability Information" on every page, which
links to a page whose entire main-body content consists of the attached.

I... um, my friend... is wondering if this is like really the wrong
approach? Isn't the content really missing the mark? And don't they
mean "accessibility" rather than "disability"?

What do folks think? Any better examples to share?

Thanks!

------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following was automatically added to this message by the list server:
-
Webnet information is available at http://webnet.berkeley.edu. Email sent to this list is archived at http://ls.berkeley.edu/mail/webnet/ . This archive is open to the general public and browsable by search engine spiders, email-address harvesting robots, your bosses, etc.
Received on Tue Nov 18 2008 - 13:59:08 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Nov 18 2008 - 13:59:08 PST