On Dec 19, 2005, at 11:22 AM, John Ingham wrote:
> been its necessarily strong typing. With CF the typing is
> essentially non existent, by comparison, which is the case with
> Ruby as I understand it. That, coupled with the fact that it is
> open source is a big draw for me as a programmer to be sure but as
> we have numerous applications running and are otherwise seriously
> invested in CF the college will probably not be shifting gears any
> time soon .
Out of curiosity, what are some of the reasons you chose CF over
PHP? I see them as essentially similar, but with PHP having the open
source advantage. Both have some features the other doesn't have, but
I'm curious what the reasons were/are for a functioning CF house.
Thanks,
Scot
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The following was automatically added to this message by the list server:
Webnet information is available at http://webnet.berkeley.edu. Email sent to this list is archived at http://ls.berkeley.edu/mail/webnet/ . This archive is open to the general public and browsable by search engine spiders, email-address harvesting robots, your bosses, etc.
Received on Mon Dec 19 12:53:40 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Dec 19 2005 - 12:53:40 PST