Re: Antivirus recommendation for Win 95

Rusty Wright wrote:
> Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 15:58:44 -0700
> To: micronet-list@listlink.berkeley.edu
> From: Mikael Hansen <mikael@berkeley.edu>
> Subject: Re: [Micronet] Antivirus recommendation for Win 95
>
> ... it can also be
> argued historically that Mac OS 9 is less vulnerable than Windows
> 2000 or XP ...
>
> Let's go back to the mainframe days with terminals, acoustic modems,
> and punched cards. We didn't have any of these stupid viruses back
> then.

You already made that point a few months ago. Do I have to re-send my
silly IBM selectric virus message? I realize it's re-run season, but
even Cheers (TM) is more interesting than this thread.

Come on, Micronet, we can do better! Think of the days when viruses
used to be *entertaining*, like Good Times (the virus, not the re-run,
although the re-run sure is dyn-o-mite).

michael

------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following was automatically added to this message by the list server:

For information about Micronet, including subscribing to
or unsubscribing from its mailing list and finding out
about upcoming meetings, please visit the Micronet Web site:
<http://micronet.berkeley.edu/>.
Received on Tue Aug 24 22:45:55 2004